Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. http://burstchef9.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-long-Away-Can-1-Be-From-a-new-5G-Mobile-Tower-Before-Becoming-Risky includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for safe distance to live from cell phone tower with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. what is a safe distance from a cell tower could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.